| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7520204 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2016 | 22 Pages | 
Abstract
												Meta-analyses evaluating continuous outcomes showed substantially higher I2 than meta-analyses of binary outcomes. Results suggest differing standards for interpreting I2 in continuous vs. binary outcomes may be appropriate.
											Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Public Health and Health Policy
												
											Authors
												Ana C. Alba, Paul E. Alexander, Joanne Chang, John MacIsaac, Samantha DeFry, Gordon H. Guyatt, 
											