Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7520204 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2016 | 22 Pages |
Abstract
Meta-analyses evaluating continuous outcomes showed substantially higher I2 than meta-analyses of binary outcomes. Results suggest differing standards for interpreting I2 in continuous vs. binary outcomes may be appropriate.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Ana C. Alba, Paul E. Alexander, Joanne Chang, John MacIsaac, Samantha DeFry, Gordon H. Guyatt,