| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7520392 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2016 | 29 Pages |
Abstract
We found that quality assessment tools were used in a majority of SRs; however, a threshold level of quality for meta-analysis was stipulated in just 12.9% (n = 40). This cross-sectional analysis provides further evidence of the need for more active or intuitive editorial processes to enhance the reporting of SRs.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Jadbinder Seehra, Nikolaos Pandis, Despina Koletsi, Padhraig S. Fleming,