Éthique d'un savoir communiquer : ça va ? ou ça va ! Point d'exclamation ou point d'interrogation

And not “How are you?”. To clear talk, should we not build another world of simple relationships, a world that is not abstract whose words will be heard in this world, will be the elementary expression, we require a reflection of effort to understand our time? Employing the very simplified verbal process of “Okay” to enter into communication is often retained and understood as aggression. Even without making the content there, the only punctuation demonstrates the benefit of the application or not understanding the concept of creating refoulement. I submit that this is in most cases an intolerable injunction. But …? Are we conditioned to the point that a term like “Okay” from a plain verbal method for contacting (theoretically correct method) is as hyperefficient? This conditioning of the population, human to human in particular, is unwittingly using operant symbols (read, seen, spoken, heard) by the knowledge of his unconscious reflexes. From this perspective, this text is referring to the meeting of two people, the “think time” that can mean only think with “the spirit dominant” but think of many other experienced time and generated daily by humans, particularly through their various life forms. Clearly, think about the implication of contextual diversity in which these times occur, not in one context could be described as global. It is said very quickly that we often find ourselves in the position to hear this false query, or the false claim and enter the appropriate behavior, while the posture of those who carry this message (question/answer) is often apparent cordiality with human nominated but not appointed. Except the one who receives the message and quickly understands that invective is for him. The intonation with where it is spoken is an important dimension, but rather present moment. As matter, “Okay” can share and understand “How is this going?” Or “Are you okay?” And differentiation between “okay?” Which means “how” and the one who asks “do” is mainly due to the intonation of the issuer, the rhythm and tonal support, says more or less anxiety and leaves more or text field for coloring the distributed. Response there will be, if the person and all attendees are able to reconcile revealing more or less anxiety, more or less compassionate, more or less logical interest or advance interested. Understanding where it happens when we run “okay”.