Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7724589 | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | 2011 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
These results provided the basis for a more guided QRA, the second phase. This phase 2 was defined in which the QRA was determined by a more limited number of release cases (scenarios). The partners in the project agreed to assess specific scenarios in order to identify the differences in consequence assessment approaches. The results of this phase provide a better understanding of the influence of modelling assumptions and limitations on the eventual conclusions with regard to risk to on-site people and to the off-site public.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemistry
Electrochemistry
Authors
Koos Ham, Alessia Marangon, Prankul Middha, Nico Versloot, Nils Rosmuller, Marco Carcassi, Olav Roald Hansen, Martino Schiavetti, Efi Papanikolaou, Alexandros Venetsanos, Angunn Engebø, Ju Lynne Saw, Jean-Bernard Saffers, Alain Flores, Dan Serbanescu,