Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8159748 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2018 | 22 Pages |
Abstract
The mean acquisition time of CS-3D-MRCP (150â¯Â±â¯63â¯s) was significantly lower than that of 3D-MRCP (317â¯Â±â¯104â¯s; Pâ¯<â¯0.001). The median score of overall quality (reader 1, 3.7â¯Â±â¯1.0 vs. 3.4â¯Â±â¯1.1, Pâ¯=â¯0.11; reader 2, 3.8â¯Â±â¯1.0 vs. 3.7â¯Â±â¯1.1, Pâ¯=â¯0.36), artifacts and visualization of the bile ducts were not significantly different between 3D-MRCP and CS-3D-MRCP. There was no significant difference in the visualization score of the index pancreatic cyst (reader 1, 4.2â¯Â±â¯0.9 vs. 4.1â¯Â±â¯0.9, Pâ¯=â¯0.42; reader 2, 4.2â¯Â±â¯0.4 vs. 4.0â¯Â±â¯0.7, Pâ¯=â¯0.27) and no difference in the assessment of cyst features. Applying CS to 3D-MRCP yields a two-fold reduction in acquisition time with comparable image quality and visualization of key pancreatic cyst features.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Condensed Matter Physics
Authors
Alessandro Furlan, Ersin Bayram, Senthur Thangasamy, Dale Barley, Anil Dasyam,