Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8309647 | Clinica Chimica Acta | 2018 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
The NanoDrop and Qubit 2.0 measurements were analyzed in order to define their correlation with qPCR cfDNA assessment, showing good correlation values with the qPCR that should be considered the “gold standard”. In our proposal, the sequential combination of NanoDrop and Qubit ssDNA methods should be adopted for a cost-effective preliminary assessment of total circulating cfDNA in melanoma and prostate cancer patients, and only discordant values should undergo qPCR assessment.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Authors
Giovanni Ponti, Monia Maccaferri, Marco Manfredini, Shaniko Kaleci, Mauro Mandrioli, Giovanni Pellacani, Tomris Ozben, Roberta Depenni, Giampaolo Bianchi, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Aldo Tomasi,