Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8311057 | Clinica Chimica Acta | 2015 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Our data indicate that aldosterone values measured with the two automated methods actually show better reproducibility, shorter laboratory Turn Around Time (TAT) and require less “hands on labor” compared to RIA and EIA immunoassays. However, in our study significant bias was observed in result comparison, this means that translating aldosterone concentration in clinical information an appropriate definition of reference ranges for each method is mandatory.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Authors
Antonio Fortunato, Concetta Prontera, Silvia Masotti, Maria Franzini, Cristina Marchetti, Stefania Giovannini, Gian Carlo Zucchelli, Michele Emdin, Claudio Passino, Aldo Clerico,