Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8311057 Clinica Chimica Acta 2015 7 Pages PDF
Abstract
Our data indicate that aldosterone values measured with the two automated methods actually show better reproducibility, shorter laboratory Turn Around Time (TAT) and require less “hands on labor” compared to RIA and EIA immunoassays. However, in our study significant bias was observed in result comparison, this means that translating aldosterone concentration in clinical information an appropriate definition of reference ranges for each method is mandatory.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biochemistry
Authors
, , , , , , , , , ,