Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8519320 | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications | 2018 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Trial coordinators receive inconsistent PRO-specific training and are often unclear how to prioritise different aspects of data quality when faced with everyday challenges, leading to inconsistent methods, missing data, poor quality data, and even bias. Agreement on how coordinators should prioritise the requirements of PRO studies is a necessary pre-requisite for the development of much-needed, consensus-based PRO administration guidelines.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Pharmaceutical Science
Authors
Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Melanie Calvert, Derek Kyte, Martin Stockler, Madeleine T. King,