Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8744991 | Clinical Microbiology and Infection | 2017 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The literature showed a clear need for studies that apply appropriate study designs- (randomized) controlled designs-to test the effectiveness of appropriate antibiotic use on achieving meaningful outcomes. Most current studies used designs prone to confounding by indication. In the process of selecting behavioural change interventions that might work best in a chosen setting, much should be learned from behavioural sciences. The challenge for stewardship teams lies in selecting change interventions on the careful assessment of barriers and facilitators, and on a theoretical base while linking determinants to change interventions. Future studies should apply more robust designs and evaluations when assessing behavioural change interventions.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Immunology and Microbiology
Microbiology
Authors
M.E.J.L. Hulscher, J.M. Prins,