| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 878951 | Accounting, Organizations and Society | 2008 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
In this response to Ahrens [Ahrens, T. (2008). Overcoming the subjective–objective divide in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2–3), 292–297.] we clarify both the motivation and the core points of the Kakkuri-Knuuttila et al. [Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L., Lukka, K., & Kuorikoski, J. (2008). Straddling between paradigms: A naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2–3), 267–291.] paper. We remind the management accounting academia that we should be careful not to close prematurely examinations and debates on issues, which are not yet truly resolved.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Accounting
Authors
Marja-Liisa Kakkuri-Knuuttila, Kari Lukka, Jaakko Kuorikoski,