Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
880309 International Journal of Research in Marketing 2011 11 Pages PDF
Abstract

The dominant perspective on organizational buying behavior suggests that buyers tend to rely on objective criteria when making product choice decisions and that the potential influence of subjective cues, such as brands, on buyer decision making decreases with increasing risk. An alternative perspective, confirmed in this study by in-depth interviews with various managers, suggests that brands serve as a risk-reduction heuristic, whereby the influence of brands on decision making increases as a function of risk. Building on risk and information processing theories, this research builds on these complementary perspectives to propose that risk and brand sensitivity relate in a U-shaped manner, where brand sensitivity is highest in relatively low- or high-risk situations. The results of scenario- and survey-based field studies—involving 206 and 180 members of buying centers, respectively—suggest that both perspectives have merit and support the proposed nonlinear relationship. Moreover, the findings reveal that the risk-brand sensitivity relationship is moderated by competitive intensity, such that the linear (negative) and quadratic (positive) effects are stronger when competitive intensity is low.

► Two complementary B2B buying perspectives suggest different roles for brands. ► We examine the purchase risk-brand sensitivity relationship in this context. ► Depth interviews and relevant theory advance our research hypotheses. ► Scenario- and survey-based field study results suggest a U-shaped relationship. ► Brand sensitivity is likely to be high when purchase risk is very low or high.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Marketing
Authors
, , , ,