Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
886755 | Journal of Vocational Behavior | 2015 | 9 Pages |
•The collective standards of career construction still exist.•The working world has posed a situation of tension between stability and flexibility.•The hegemonic discourses of flexible careers for all workers are partial.•The search for flexibility in career is not always a destabilizing situation.•There is a hybrid nature of contemporary career constructions.
By means of a qualitative approach, this study sought to understand the patterns of career construction in contemporary times through content analysis of the narratives generated by a set of 40 urban workers in São Paulo (Brazil), intentionally selected. Five narrative patterns of career construction were found and related to the existing concepts (organizational career, protean and boundaryless career, professional career, transitional career, and hybrid careers), which were respectively described by their core feature (nostalgia, possibility, enclosure, instrumentality, and hybrid). The main results showed that one quarter of participants sought career stability, continuity, and linearity (Nostalgia), one quarter sought flexibility and discontinuity (Possibility), about 1/7 sought a career based on the profession/occupation (Enclosure), about one-third constructed hybrid career narratives, and there was a frequent emergence of crises (Instrumentality). The main contribution of this study was confirming the hybrid nature of contemporary career constructions produced in a constant tension between stability and flexibility, as well as between permanence and change; nevertheless, based on collective standards.