Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
886827 Journal of Vocational Behavior 2015 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Survey respondents' leader preferences if they were taking a new job were solicited.•Respondents preferred to work for a man more than a woman if they had a preference.•Respondents preferred to work for a same-sex boss more than an opposite-sex boss.•Sex-typed respondents preferred to work for a boss of a particular sex.•Implications for job applicants' vocational decisions and female leaders are noted.

A survey of 455 individuals sampled from two populations that varied in age, educational level, and work experience posed a question asked in Gallup polls over six decades: “If you were taking a new job and had your choice of a boss, would you prefer to work for a man or a woman?” Respondents could state that they would prefer a male boss, prefer a female boss, or had no preference. As expected from theory and Gallup results, respondents who had a preference preferred to work for a man more than a woman, although a majority expressed “no preference.” When they expressed a preference, women preferred to work for a female boss over a male boss more than men did, whereas men preferred to work for a male boss over a female boss more than women did. Sex-typed (i.e., masculine or feminine) respondents in gender identity exhibited a greater preference to work for a boss of a particular sex over having no preference than non-sex-typed respondents. Further, feminine respondents preferred to work for a female boss over a male boss more than masculine respondents did, whereas masculine respondents preferred to work for a male boss over a female boss more than feminine respondents did. Overall, these results suggest that the preference to work for a man or a woman is a matter of both sex and gender. Implications for job applicants' vocational decisions and how female leaders fare in the workplace are discussed.

Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Marketing
Authors
, ,