| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 888209 | The Leadership Quarterly | 2009 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
We tested a model in which two bases of trust mediated the effects of supervisory procedural justice. Two conceptually distinct mechanisms were proposed to explain how different procedural justice effects are manifested. Structural equation modeling results using 203 individuals with matched supervisory ratings from a cross-section of organizations located in Taiwan supported our model. Cognitive trust mediated the relations of supervisory procedural justice with performance and job satisfaction, whereas affective trust mediated relations between supervisory procedural justice and helping behavior at work.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Business and International Management
Authors
Jixia Yang, Kevin W. Mossholder, T.K. Peng,