| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 890059 | Personality and Individual Differences | 2015 | 7 Pages |
•Rigorous test of the 2 × 2 and the tripartite model of perfectionism.•1006 Participants living in Canada or in China were studied.•Latent moderation structural equation modeling was used.•Tripartite model of perfectionism was supported in both groups.•Perfectionistic strivings exacerbated the effect of concerns on negative emotionality.
For most individuals, perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns coexist to varying degrees. While there is agreement that within-person combinations of perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns produce meaningful “subtypes”, the number and characterization of these within-person combinations is still debated. The two most prominent person-centered perfectionism models (the tripartite model and the 2 × 2 model) offer differing characterizations of how perfectionistic strivings effects perfectionistic concerns’ relationship with psychological outcomes. According to the 2 × 2 model, perfectionistic strivings buffers against the negative effects of perfectionistic concerns. The 2 × 2 model thus claims the most deleterious within-person combination of perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns is low strivings and high concerns. In contrast, according to the tripartite model, perfectionistic strivings exacerbates the maladaptive effects of perfectionistic concerns. The tripartite model thus claims the most maladaptive within-person combination of perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns is high strivings and high concerns. The present study tested these competing claims in a group of English speaking Canadians and a group of Mandarin speaking Chinese. Results support the tripartite model of perfectionism.
