| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 891080 | Personality and Individual Differences | 2013 | 4 Pages |
An evolutionary history of human female infidelity and consequent sperm competition may have caused the evolution of male counter-adaptations. The infidelity-detection hypothesis for oral sex proposes that men perform oral sex to gather information about their partner’s recent sexual history. We tested this hypothesis with data secured from 231 men in committed, sexual, heterosexual relationships. We found support for two derivative predictions: men at a greater recurrent risk of sperm competition expressed greater interest in, and spent more time performing, oral sex on their partner, even after controlling statistically for relationship length, relationship satisfaction, and sexual intercourse duration. The discussion addresses limitations of this research and highlights directions for future research, including distinguishing empirically the infidelity-detection hypothesis from alternative hypotheses for oral sex.
► We test the idea that oral sex functions to detect partner’s sexual infidelity. ► Men with more attractive partners have more interest in performing oral sex. ► Men with more attractive partners spend more time performing oral sex.
