The Error-Oriented Motivation Scale: An examination of structural and convergent validity

The current paper describes an analysis of the factor structure and convergent validity of the Error-Oriented Motivation Scale (EOMS). The EOMS is an attempt to validate a context-general and brief measure of error orientations theoretically similar to the Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) written by (Rybowiak, Garst, Frese, and Batinic (1999)). Motivation theory, particularly approach/avoidance motives and goal theory, was chosen as a foundational model for the new EOMS measure, arguing that errors take on properties of goals when they occur by creating a discrepancy, which generates arousal and direction toward a solution. In this article, the factor structure of the EOMS is examined, as well as expected correlations with subscales of the EOQ. The discussion focuses on the advantages of the EOMS measure and suggestions for its further validation and use in applied settings.

► The Error-Oriented Motivations Scale (EOMS) is a brief measure describing reactions to self-produced errors. ► The scale is built on approach-avoidance theory and includes three distinct orientations. ► This study assessed the validity of the scale by correlating with another measure of error orientation. ► Results showed strong and predictable agreement between the two scales, supporting the validity of the EOMS.