Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8924101 IHJ Cardiovascular Case Reports (CVCR) 2017 22 Pages PDF
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT- defibrillator and CRT-pacemaker) implantations have increased remarkably over the last decade. Conventionally these devices are used in patients with symptomatic systolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction who either have electrical or mechanical evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony or have bradycardia with high requirement of ventricular pacing. We report three cases in which patients without the standard indications for CRT derived remarkable benefit from biventricular pacing. The clinical considerations in patient selection and device implantation have been highlighted.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, ,