Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
895885 | Scandinavian Journal of Management | 2012 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
This short reflective piece explores what it means to adopt a ‘critical’ position in organizational scholarship. We offer three separate narratives that combine when we consider what it means to believe in being critical. Each narrative examines the identification with this particular academic perspective from a different standpoint, including the performance of rationality and embodiment; the assessment of quality through the in-group/out-group theories of social psychology; and the implications of hyper-performativity for having a range of critical voices heard. We conclude by suggesting ways in which the critical community might adopt a more reflective position about embodied behaviors.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Strategy and Management
Authors
Ali Young, Inma Adarves-Yorno, Scott Taylor,