Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9000811 | Farmacia Hospitalaria | 2005 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Poor evidence supports effectiveness of intermittent heparin flushing vs. NaCl 0.9% solution, although methodological limitations and small sample size make these findings very inconsistent. In infection prophylaxis, there is no data allowing us to conclude if heparin flushing is more effective than NaCl 0.9% solution. More randomized clinical trials are needed.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Pharmaceutical Science
Authors
E. López-Briz, V. Ruiz-GarcÃa,