Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
916609 Cognitive Development 2008 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

In our comments on Pacton and Deacon's discussion of children's spelling of morphemes we raise four issues: (1) whether the “timing” question should be about children's ages or about their psychological processes; (2) the crucial importance of individual differences in the study of the connections that people make between morphemes and spelling; (3) the conclusions that can be drawn from evidence for the use of non-morphemic spelling strategies; (4) the need to consider the results of intervention studies in any account of children's understanding and use of morphemic spelling rules.

Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology
Authors
, ,