Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9234257 | Injury | 2005 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
This study compares non-absorbable, ethyl cellulose (EC) membranes and absorbable, chitosan (CH) membranes in a rabbit model. Bone regeneration, evaluated by radiological and pathological parameters, was seen in both groups. In the EC group the process was faster but was followed by a sharp decrease, whereas in the CH group it was slower and continuous.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Emergency Medicine
Authors
Nicola Joseph Nasser, Adi Friedman, Michael Friedman, Eitan Moor, Rami Mosheiff,