Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9268565 | Journal of Clinical Virology | 2005 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The sensitivity and specificity of both methods seem to be more or less comparable. However, the in-house RT-PCR assay appears to amplify some rhinovirus strains and should therefore not be used for throat swab samples. NucliSens EasyQ Enterovirus assay gave more invalid results than the in-house RT-PCR, which is obvious taken into account the difference in quality control between the CE marked NucliSens EasyQ Enterovirus assay and the in-house enterovirus assay. The NucliSens EasyQ procedure can be completed within 5Â h versus 9.5Â h for the RT-PCR. NucliSens EasyQ Enterovirus assay showed to be a standardized, rapid, specific, sensitive and reliable procedure for the detection of enterovirus RNA.
Keywords
HSV-1ECLRT-PCRHSV-2RNAElectrochemiluminescenceEnterovirusReverse transcriptaseMolecular diagnosisnucleic acid sequence based amplificationNASBAFemaleCMVcytomegalovirusCSFCerebrospinal fluidMalewildtypepolymerase chain reactionreverse-transcribed polymerase chain reactionPCRHerpes simplex virus type 1herpes simplex virus type 2tissue culture infective dose 50%
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Immunology and Microbiology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Authors
S.E. Capaul, M. Gorgievski-Hrisoho,