| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 951461 | Journal of Research in Personality | 2011 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
⺠CFA models with method factors fit Big Five questionnaire data significantly better than models without method factors. ⺠Models with a general method factor and method factors specific to item wording provided the best fit. ⺠Big Five dimensions in models estimating method factors were more nearly orthogonal than Big Five scale scores. ⺠Relationships to other variables suggest that the method factors represent substantive personality characteristics.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
Michael D. Biderman, Nhung T. Nguyen, Christopher J.L. Cunningham, Nima Ghorbani,