Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
951485 Journal of Research in Personality 2012 18 Pages PDF
Abstract

Multiple inventories claiming to assess the same explicit motive (achievement, power, or affiliation) show only mediocre convergent validity. In three studies (N = 1685) the structure, nomological net, and content coverage of multiple existing motive scales was investigated with exploratory factor analyses. The analyses revealed four approach factors (achievement, power, affiliation, and intimacy) and a general avoidance factor with a facet structure. New scales (the Unified Motive Scales; UMS) were developed using IRT, reflecting these underlying dimensions. In comparison to existing questionnaires, the UMS have the highest measurement precision and provide short (six-item) and ultra-short (three-item) scales. In a fourth study (N = 96), the UMS demonstrated incremental validity over existing motive scales with respect to several outcome criteria.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights► Fourteen motive scales (achievement, power, affiliation, intimacy) filled out by n = 1030. ► New scales developed to reflect main dimensions: Unified Motive Scales (UMS). ► Hope and fear scales for all motives. ► Higher measurement precision due to item response scaling. ► Incremental validity for criteria: up to 46% of R2 uniquely predicted by UMS.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
, ,