The comparative role of iShares and country funds in internationally diversified portfolios

This paper examines the performance and diversification gains provided by iShares versus closed-end country funds over the period 1996 through 2006. Findings include: (1) iShares reveal weaker effects from U.S. market exposure than do country funds; (2) U.S. investors react similarly to foreign currency risk associated with iShares and country funds; (3) the average risk-adjusted performance of passively managed iShares is better than that of their respective actively managed country funds; and (4) iShares provide U.S. investors greater diversification gains than do country funds, that is, U.S. investors should prefer iShares to country funds when diversifying portfolios internationally.