| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 960257 | Journal of Financial Economics | 2014 | 18 Pages |
Abstract
This study examines the empirical controversy over the pricing effect of the Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O׳Hara (2002) probability of information-based trading, PIN, on a sample of 30,095 firms from 47 countries worldwide. Contrary to the empirical evidence of Easley, Hvidkjaer, and O׳Hara, but consistent with that of Duarte and Young (2009), we do not find that PIN exhibits a positive effect on a cross section of expected stock returns in international markets. Alternative information-based trading measures also display no effect on expected stock returns, corroborating our finding that information risk proxied by PIN, in general, has no pricing effect in world markets.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Accounting
Authors
Sandy Lai, Lilian Ng, Bohui Zhang,
