Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
960339 | Journal of Financial Economics | 2012 | 20 Pages |
Abstract
Assessments of the trade-off theory have typically compared the present value of tax benefits to the present value of bankruptcy costs. We verify that this comparison overwhelmingly favors tax benefits, suggesting that firms are under-leveraged. However, when we allow firms to experience even modest (e.g., 1–2% annualized) financial distress costs prior to bankruptcy, the cumulative present value of such costs can easily offset the tax benefits.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Accounting
Authors
Redouane Elkamhi, Jan Ericsson, Christopher A. Parsons,