Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
960935 | Journal of Financial Intermediation | 2015 | 23 Pages |
Abstract
This paper develops a theory of strategic information disclosure with disagreement. Managers of firms are voluntarily communicating subjective information, and prior beliefs about the strategy to maximize project value are rational but heterogeneous, potentially generating fundamental disagreement. Three main results are derived. First, not all firms disclose (subjective) information about strategy. Second, more valuable firms, and those whose strategies investors are more likely to agree with, disclose less information in equilibrium. Third, improved corporate governance leads to lower executive compensation and less information disclosure. An implication of the analysis for banks is that greater strategic information disclosure may increase the probability of bank runs-banks may choose to be opaque because transparency makes them fragile.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Strategy and Management
Authors
Anjan V. Thakor,