Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-Slice Computed Tomography for Detection of Graft Occlusion or Patency After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) was reviewed. A search of published studies in all languages was performed, incorporating electronic and manual components. A total of 985 patients with 2,200 CABGs participated in investigations with single-detector computed tomography (CT), 441 patients (1,246 CABGs) with 4-slice CT, none with 8-slice CT, and 144 patients (416 grafts) with 16-slice CT. Pooled data showed a sensitivity for the detection of complete occlusion with single-slice CT of 81% (402 of 494 patients), with 4-slice CT of 93% (293 of 315 patients), and with 16-slice CT of 99% (75 of 76 patients). The specificity, based on pooled data, using single-slice CT was 89% (1,507 of 1,697 patients), with 4-slice CT was 96% (878 of 915 patients), and with 16-slice CT was 98% (301 of 306 patients). The detection of complete occlusion and the detection of patency in saphenous vein bypass grafts and arterial bypass grafts were similar with multislice CT. Limited data were available on the detection of significant stenosis, exclusive of complete occlusion. With 4-slice CT, the sensitivity was 74% (23 of 31 patients) and was 88% (21 of 24 patients) with 16-slice CT. In conclusion, single-detector CT was able to detect graft patency, but it was not sensitive for graft occlusion. The data suggest that 4- and 16-slice CT can be used for the detection of complete graft occlusion or graft patency of CABGs. Significant stenosis was better assessed with 16-slice CT than with 4-slice CT.