Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9936597 | The American Journal of Cardiology | 2005 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Studies analyzing the diagnostic value of 12-lead electrocardiographic criteria differentiating slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) due to concealed accessory pathway have shown inconsistent results. In 97 patients (50 with AVNRT, 47 with AVRT) 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded during sinus rhythm and tachycardia (QRS <120 ms). The ECGs were blinded for diagnosis and patient and analyzed independently by 2 electrophysiologists. The studied criteria differentiating AVNRT from AVRT included pseudo-râ²/S, the presence of a retrograde P wave, RP interval, ST-segment depression â¥2 mm with the number and location of the affected leads, QRS amplitude, and cycle length alternans.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Arash MD, Hans MD, Christopher MD, Petra MD, Hildegard MD, Richard MD, Anja MD, Jing-Hong MD, Gerhard MD,