Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9940713 | American Journal of Hypertension | 2005 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
During the past 10 years, clinical outcome studies have consistently reported 24-h ABPM and SBPM to be significantly better predictors of cardiovascular events compared with the office BP, even when recorded under “research conditions.” Based on the available evidence, the Canadian Hypertension Education Program has now developed an algorithm for diagnosing hypertension that offers three options: 1) conventional office BP, 2) SBPM, or 3) 24-h ABPM. Out-of-office BP measurements are recommended, whenever feasible, to minimize both measurement error associated with mercury sphygmomanometry and the white coat effect experienced by some patients.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Martin G. Myers, Sheldon W. Tobe, Donald W. McKay, Peter Bolli, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Finlay A. McAlister, Canadian Hypertension Education Program Canadian Hypertension Education Program,