| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9960816 | Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2005 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The universal use of PES in an unrestricted setting is safe and is associated with a similar adjusted outcome compared to SES. The inferior trend in crude outcome seen in PES was due to its higher-risk population. A larger, randomized study enrolling an unselected population may assist in determining the relative superiority of either device.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Andrew T.L. MBBS, FRACP, Patrick W. MD, PhD, FACC, Jiro MD, Angela MBChB, MRCP, Carlos A.G. MD, Gaston A. MD, Marco MD, Karel Sonnenschein, Evelyn MD, PhD, Martin MD, PhD, Peter P.T. MD, PhD, Eugene P. MBChB, MD, FRCPI, FACC, Georgios MD, PhD,