Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9960992 | Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2005 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The two pivotal U.S. trials of drug-eluting stents do not establish the principle that these stents are superior to thin-strut bare-metal stents for preventing repeat revascularization in patients with diabetes. Neither study was adequately powered to make this determination. Moreover, both studies used thick-strut stents known to have high restenosis rates as controls. Low angiographic follow-up underestimates the true target lesion revascularization rate in the Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (TAXUS-IV) trial because of the high incidence of silent ischemia in patients with diabetes. Optimal therapy for diabetic coronary disease should include a comprehensive approach directed toward metabolic normalization in addition to local stent-based therapy.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Aloke V. MD, Igor F. MD, Adnan MD, Herman K. MD,