Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10252261 | Urban Forestry & Urban Greening | 2014 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
We found that large brick substrates had a lower water holding capacity than small brick (â35%), which led to decreased shoot growth (â17%) and increased root:shoot ratio (+16%). Green waste compost increased shoot and root growth (+32% and +13%) shoot nitrogen concentration and chlorophyll content (20% and 57%), and decreased root:shoot ratio (â15%) compared to bark. The addition of swell gel increased substrate water holding capacity (+24%), which increased shoot growth (+8%). Total evapotranspiration (a proxy for potential cooling) was increased by greater shoot biomass and substrate water holding capacity. Overall, this study provides one of the first quantitative assessments of the relative importance of commonly used green roof substrate components. It is clear that substrate composition should be considered carefully when designing green roofs, and substrate composition can be tailored for green roof service provision.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Forestry
Authors
Thomas Young, Duncan D. Cameron, Jeff Sorrill, Tim Edwards, Gareth K. Phoenix,