Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
10841080 Plant Science 2005 5 Pages PDF
Abstract
Previous experience with citrus somatic fusion suggests that hybrid cells are generally more vigorous and have higher capacity for embryogenesis, compared to unfused cells from the embryogenic callus parent. However, this observation has never been validated due to the unavailability of an appropriate experimental design. Citrus mesophyll protoplasts never divide and regenerate into plants. Herein, mesophyll protoplasts of transgenic Valencia orange (Citrus sinensis) which expressed the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene were fused with protoplasts isolated from an embryogenic callus line of Shekwasha mandarin (C. reticulata) to visually screen somatic hybrids. At the multi-cell cluster stage, the regenerated callus lines expressing GFP were morphologically identical to the callus parent regenerate. All hybrid callus lines expressing the GFP developed into embryoids, while most callus parent regenerates still remained in a callus stage. Embryoids with strong or weak GFP expression were verified to be diploid cybrid and tetraploid somatic hybrid embryoids, respectively, by flow cytometry, simple sequence repeat (SSR) and chloroplast SSR analyses. Diploid cybrid globular embryoids appeared light green in color and had a tendency to enter subsequent developmental stages earlier than the dark green tetraploids; however, GFP plants were regenerated from both sources. Thus, expression of the GFP marker gene was effectively used to visually screen somatic hybrids, and confirmed our previous observation that somatic hybrid tissue has a regeneration advantage. The intensity of GFP fluorescence and the color difference of regenerated embryoids was also an early indicator of ploidy level (based on visual GFP observation and confirmed by flow cytometry analysis), and could serve as a tool to study the regeneration mechanism of diploid cybrids via symmetric fusion in citrus and other higher plants.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Plant Science
Authors
, ,