Evaluating aggressive behavior in dogs: a comparison of 3 tests

The observed agreement among the 3 tests was compared relative to chance using a κ test. Significant but low levels of agreement were found among the 3 tests for the criterion “intraspecific behavior” (κ = 0.133, P = .014), with the highest correlation between Tests A and B (κ = 0.345, P < .001) and for the criterion “interspecific behavior” (κ = 0.135, P = 0. 014), with Tests A and B (κ = 0.220, P = .005) showing the highest correlation. However, significant absolute values of κ were low in all cases. In a further analysis, dogs evaluated to show no signs of potential aggression in the test situations by all 3 tests were eliminated, and the results of the remaining dogs (“interspecific behavior,” n = 23; “intraspecific behavior,” n = 29) were assessed for disagreement in pairwise combinations using a McNemar chi-square test. No significant levels of disagreement were found for “intraspecific behavior,” however, for “interspecific behavior,” Tests A and B (P = .035), and Tests B and C (P < .001) differed significantly, with no significant difference between Tests A and B (P = 0.11). The inconsistency of the results from different tests suggests test bias at the very least and questions the validity of these tests. Further work examining the validity of each individual test is warranted if they are to be used in a legal context.