Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
11031385 | Journal of Experimental Child Psychology | 2019 | 17 Pages |
Abstract
The assumption that natural and social categories have deeper “essences” is a fundamental feature of the conceptual system, with wide-ranging consequences for behavior. What are the developmental origins of this assumption? We propose that essentialism emerges in part from a bias in the process of generating explanations that leads reasoners to overuse inherent or intrinsic features. Consistent with this proposal, the inherence bias in 4-year-olds' explanations predicted the strength of their essentialist beliefs (Study 1; Nâ¯=â¯64), and manipulations of the inherence bias in 4- to 7-year-olds (Studies 2 and 3; Nâ¯=â¯112 each) led to subsequent changes in the essentialist beliefs of children who attended to the manipulation. These findings contribute to our understanding of the origins of essentialism.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Authors
Shelbie L. Sutherland, Andrei Cimpian,