Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
145431 Chemical Engineering Journal 2016 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

•In the literature about adsorption kinetics, 2 rate laws are generally compared.•They correspond to pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetics.•The method generally used for the comparison suffers from a methodological bias.•This bias unfairly favors pseudo-second order kinetics.•A different method is proposed to analyze experimental data.

In most works in the current literature about liquid/solid adsorption kinetics, the respective abilities of pseudo-first order and pseudo-second kinetics for describing the data are compared. In nearly all cases, it is concluded that the latter surpasses the former. The aim of this work is to point out that more caution should be exercised in this comparison. Indeed, it appears that the method generally used is flawed and that it unfairly favors pseudo-second order kinetics. A different method is proposed to analyze experimental results. It is employed here to reexamine experimental data taken from the literature.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering (General)
Authors
,