Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2096812 Theriogenology 2006 15 Pages PDF
Abstract

The present study was designed to characterize and compare the physiology and ultrasonographic morphology of the corpus luteum (CL) during regression and resurgence following a single dose of native prostaglandin F2α (PGF) given 3 days after ovulation, with a more conventional treatment given 10 days after ovulation. On the day of pre-treatment ovulation (Day 0), horse mares were randomly assigned to receive PGF (Lutalyse®; 10 mg/mare, i.m.) on Day 3 (17 mares) or Day 10 (17 mares). Beginning on either Days 3 or 10, follicle and CL data and blood samples were collected daily until post-treatment ovulation. Functional and structural regression of the CL in response to PGF treatment were similar in both the Day 3 and 10 groups, as indicated by an abrupt decrease in circulating concentrations of progesterone, decrease in luteal gland diameter and increase in luteal tissue echogenicity. As a result, the mean ± S.E.M. interovulatory interval was shorter (P < 0.0001) in the Day 3 group (13.2 ± 0.9 days) than in the Day 10 group (19.2 ± 0.7 days). Within the Day 3 group, functional resurgence of the CL was detected in 75% of the mares (12 of 16) beginning 3 days after PGF treatment, as indicated by transient major (6 mares) and minor (6 mares) increases (P < 0.05 and <0.1, respectively) in progesterone. Correspondingly, mean length of the interovulatory interval was longer (P < 0.03) in mares with major resurgence (15.8 ± 1.6 days) than in mares with minor (11.2 ± 1.2 days) and no resurgences (13.5 ± 0.3 days) in progesterone. Structural resurgence of the CL in the Day 3 group and functional and structural resurgence in the Day 10 group were not detected. In conclusion, PGF treatment 3 days after ovulation resulted in structural and functional regression of the CL and hastened the interval to the next ovulation, despite post-treatment resurgences in progesterone.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
, , ,