Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2422440 Aquaculture 2012 4 Pages PDF
Abstract

The effect of stocking density on the reproductive output of Florida apple snails was investigated with the goal of developing a captive breeding program that would sustain year-round production and yield a high number of juvenile snails. We examined stocking densities of 50, 100, and 150 snails/m2 to determine the threshold at which density negatively affects reproduction. Adult snails were added to tanks in a recirculating aquaculture system at a 1:1 sex ratio and reproductive output was followed for 8 weeks. The total number of clutches per tank and the number of eggs per clutch were recorded daily. The number of egg clutches produced in each tank was standardized per female to assess among treatment differences. Once hatched, the juveniles were counted and the percent hatch rates were determined for each clutch. The findings of the study demonstrated that density affected the mean number of clutches laid per female per week with snails in the 50 snails/m2 treatment having higher egg production than snails stocked at 100 and 150 snails/m2 treatments. Similarly, the number of juveniles produced per female was also higher in the lowest density treatment. There were no significant differences between treatments for egg characteristics (number of eggs per clutch and percent hatch rate). Based on these results, it is recommended that adult snails be stocked at 50 snails/m2 to yield optimum egg production per female, attain the highest number of juveniles, and to sustain production for a reliable captive breeding program.

► We examined the effect of stocking density on reproductive output of Florida apple snails. ► Florida apple snails should be stocked at 50 snails/m2 to yield optimum egg production per female. ► A total of 44,679 juveniles were produced by 220 females in only eight weeks. ► There was no significant difference in the number of eggs per clutch or percent hatch rate across all density treatments.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Aquatic Science
Authors
, , , ,