Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment

To test some predictions of scalar expectancy theory (SET) for the time-left procedure, we performed one experiment with two conditions. In Condition A, pigeons were exposed to two fixed-interval schedules, a fixed-interval (FI) 30 s and an FI 60 s, each associated with a distinct key and presented on a separate trial. Subsequently, during test trials, the FI 60-s key was illuminated and then after T = 15, 30 or 45 s the FI 30-s key also was illuminated. The main issue was how choice between the two keys varied with T. Condition B replicated Condition A with different FI parameters and T values. The results showed that (a) contrary to SET's predictions, preference changed reliably with testing, which suggests that learning took place during the test trials; (b) within each test trial, pigeons revealed an almost exclusive preference for one of the keys, and (c) at steady state pigeons behaved in the same way as rats. Because SET could not account for these findings we advanced a new descriptive model of performance for the time-left task. The model fit the data well.