Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2440502 | Journal of Dairy Science | 2008 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Based on previous research, we hypothesized that Cosynch at 72 h [GnRHâ7 dâPGF2α;â72 hâGnRH + artificial insemination (AI)] would result in a greater number of pregnancies per AI (P/AI) than Cosynch at 48 h. Further, we hypothesized that P/AI would be improved to a greater extent when GnRH was administered at 56 h after PGF2α; before AI at 72 h due to a more optimal interval between the LH surge and AI. Nine hundred twenty-seven lactating dairy cows (n = 1,507 AI) were blocked by pen, and pens rotated through treatments. All cows received GnRH followed 7 d later by PGF2α; and then received one of the following: 1) GnRH + timed AI 48 h after PGF2α; (Cosynch-48); 2) GnRH 56 h after PGF2α; + timed AI 72 h after PGF2α; (Ovsynch-56); or 3) GnRH + timed AI 72 h after PGF2α; (Cosynch-72). Pregnancy diagnoses were performed by ultrasound at 31 to 33 d post-AI and again at 52 to 54 d post-AI. Overall P/AI were similar for the Cosynch-48 (29.2%) and Cosynch-72 (25.4%) groups. The Ovsynch-56 group had a greater P/AI (38.6%) than Cosynch-48 or Cosynch-72. Presynchronized first-service animals had greater P/AI than cows at later services in Cosynch-48 (36.2 vs. 23.0%) and Ovsynch-56 (44.8 vs. 32.7%) but not in Cosynch-72 (24.6 vs. 26.2%). Similarly, primiparous cows had greater P/AI than multiparous cows in Cosynch-48 (34.1 vs. 22.9%) and Ovsynch-56 (41.3 vs. 32.6%), but not Cosynch-72 (29.8 vs. 25.3%). In conclusion, we found no advantage to Cosynch at 72 h vs. 48 h. In contrast, we found a clear advantage to treating with GnRH at 56 h, 16 h before a 72 h AI, probably because of more-optimal timing of AI before ovulation.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
D.J. Brusveen, A.P. Cunha, C.D. Silva, P.M. Cunha, R.A. Sterry, E.P.B. Silva, J.N. Guenther, M.C. Wiltbank,