| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2452513 | Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2014 | 15 Pages |
•We surveyed producers’ key beliefs related to outbreak response measures.•Behaviors examined included gathering and holding cattle, and obeying movement bans.•Frequently indicated barriers included lack of manpower or financial resources to gather and hold cattle.•Poor perceived efficacy and animal welfare concerns may decrease movement ban compliance.•Uncertainty related to negative consequences represents a key communication target.
The voluntary cooperation of producers with disease control measures such as movement restrictions and gathering cattle for testing, vaccination, or depopulation is critical to the success of many disease control programs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Texas in order to determine the distribution of key beliefs about obeying movement restrictions and gathering and holding cattle for disease control purposes. Two questionnaires were developed and distributed to separate representative samples of Texas cow-calf producers, respectively. The context for each behavior was provided through the use of scenarios in the questionnaire. Belief strength was measured using a 7-point Likert-like scale. Producers surveyed were unsure about the possible negative consequences of gathering and holding their cattle when requested by authorities, suggesting a key need for communication in this area during an outbreak. Respondents identified a lack of manpower and/or financial resources to gather and hold cattle as barriers to their cooperation with orders to gather and hold cattle. Producers also expressed uncertainty about the efficacy of movement restrictions to prevent the spread of foot-and-mouth disease and concern about possible feed shortages or animal suffering. However, there are emotional benefits to complying with movement restrictions and strong social expectations of cooperation with any movement bans put in place.
