Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2454114 The Professional Animal Scientist 2010 4 Pages PDF
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding, withdrawal, and refeeding 10 ppm ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) on pig performance. In Exp. 1, the 4 treatments consisted of 1) a control diet fed for 56 d before marketing; 2) RAC fed for the first 21 d, and then the control diet fed for the last 35 d; 3) RAC fed for the first 21 d, the control diet fed for 14 d, and then RAC fed for the last 21 d; and 4) the control diet fed for the first 35 d, and then RAC fed for the last 21 d. Pigs fed RAC for the last 21 d of the study or those fed RAC from d 0 to 21 and then from d 35 to 56 had greater (P < 0.01) ADG and G:F than control pigs. In Exp. 2, the 5 treatments consisted of 1) a control diet fed for 56 d; 2) RAC fed for 56 d; 3) RAC fed for the first 21 d, the control diet for fed for 14 d, and then RAC fed for the last 21 d; 4) the control diet fed for the first 7 d, RAC fed for 21 d, the control diet fed for 7 d, and then RAC fed for the last 21 d; and 5) the control diet fed for the first 35 d, and then RAC fed for the last 21 d. When RAC was fed for 21 d and then withdrawn for either 7 or 14 d and refed for 21 d, the pigs had the same overall ADG and G:F as those fed RAC for only the last 21 d of the study.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
, , , , , , , ,