Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2454461 | The Professional Animal Scientist | 2009 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The main objective was to determine if yellow, short-season field peas could partially replace corn and soybean meal in mid- and late-nursery pig diets (6.5 to 7.5Â kg BW in phase 1 and 10 to 13Â kg BW in phase 2, respectively), and to evaluate the efficacy of a fungal hemicellulase-cellulase preparation (enzyme). Two experiments with 366 nursery pigs (n = 240 in Exp. 1, and n = 126 in Exp. 2) were conducted feeding a 2-phase program, 14 d each. Experiment 1 used a 2 * 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with 0 or 20% peas with or without enzyme addition. Experiment 2 evaluated enzyme supplementation to nursery diets containing 20% peas. There were 40 pens with 10 replications (6 pigs/pen) in Exp. 1 and 18 pens with 9 replications (7 pigs/pen) in Exp. 2. In Exp. 1, significant increases were found in ADG (385 vs. 418 g/d for the control diet and diet with peas, respectively; P = 0.01), ADFI (561 vs. 632 g/d for the control diet and diet with peas, respectively; P = 0.01), and significant decreases were found in G:F from 0 to 28 d (685 vs. 658 g/kg for the control and pea diet; P = 0.01). Enzyme supplementation tended to increase ADG (P = 0.10) from 0 to 28 d. Inclusion of yellow field peas (20%) in the mid- and late-nursery periods provided significant improvements in nursery pig growth performance compared with corn- and soybean meal-based diets. Diets including field peas, enzymes, or both were economically competitive but not superior to the corn-soybean meal diet. However, inclusion of the enzyme improved animal performance and net value in the pea diet.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
K.R. Brooks, B.R. Wiegand, A.L. Meteer, G.I. Petersen, J.D. Spencer, J.R. Winter, J.A. Robb,