Reliability and validity of skin temperature measurement by telemetry thermistors and a thermal camera during exercise in the heat

•Telemetry thermistors and thermal camera compared against hard-wired thermistors.•Comparisons on a solid body before human skin during rest and exercise in the heat.•Good validity and reliability for thermistors but not thermal camera.•Telemetry thermistors recommended for measurements in the field.•Thermal cameras may be better suited to controlled, static situations.

New technologies afford convenient modalities for skin temperature (TSKIN) measurement, notably involving wireless telemetry and non-contact infrared thermometry. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of skin temperature measurements using a telemetry thermistor system (TT) and thermal camera (TC) during exercise in a hot environment. Each system was compared against a certified thermocouple, measuring the surface temperature of a metal block in a thermostatically controlled waterbath. Fourteen recreational athletes completed two incremental running tests, separated by one week. Skin temperatures were measured simultaneously with TT and TC compared against a hard-wired thermistor system (HW) throughout rest and exercise. Post hoc calibration based on waterbath results displayed good validity for TT (mean bias [MB]=−0.18 °C, typical error [TE]=0.18 °C) and reliability (MB=−0.05 °C, TE=0.31 °C) throughout rest and exercise. Poor validity (MB=−1.4 °C, TE=0.35 °C) and reliability (MB=−0.65 °C, TE=0.52 °C) was observed for TC, suggesting it may be best suited to controlled, static situations. These findings indicate TT systems provide a convenient, valid and reliable alternative to HW, useful for measurements in the field where traditional methods may be impractical.