Environmental and spatial correlates of community composition, richness and status of boreal lake macrophytes

•Macrophytes were explained by natural covariates, human disturbance and space.•Response to environment and space varied significantly among functional groups.•Environmental variables were strongly geographically structured.•Ecological indices were mainly explained by natural covariates.•Geographical structuring of environmental variables and large extent negatively affected indices.

We assessed the relative roles of natural covariates, human disturbance (water quality and catchment land use) together with geography in driving variation in aquatic macrophyte community composition, richness and status among 101 lakes in southern and central Finland. In addition to all species together, we studied different growth forms (i.e. emergent and submerged macrophytes and aquatic bryophytes) separately. Partial redundancy analysis (taxonomic composition) and partial least-squares regression (species richness and status index) were employed to display the share of variability in macrophyte assemblages that was attributable to the environmental factors (both natural and human-affected) and the spatial filters generated through principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM).Macrophyte community composition, richness and status were explained by natural covariates, together with joint effects of human disturbance variables and space. The contributions of pure fractions of human disturbance and space were mostly modest, albeit variable among macrophyte groups and status indices. Alkalinity, historical distributions, colour, dynamic ratio and lake area were most important natural covariates for macrophytes. Of those variables influenced by human, macrophytes were mostly explained by conductivity, total phosphorus, turbidity and chlorophyll-a.Our results demonstrate, as expected, that macrophytes are dominantly affected by local environmental variables, whereas dispersal-related processes seem not to be important at regional extent. Response of macrophyte growth forms to environment and space, however, varied significantly. Community composition and richness of emergent macrophytes showed congruent response to natural covariates and human disturbance. Aquatic bryophytes, which are rarely studied along lake macrophytes, responded stronger than other growth forms to human disturbance. Contrary to our expectations, ecological indices were not affected by dispersal-related processes, but were mainly explained by natural covariates. This study is the first to investigate spatial patterns in aquatic macrophytes derived bioassessment. Geographical structuring of environmental variables and regional extent negatively affected indices, suggesting that ecological status assessment needs further development.