| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4373703 | Ecological Indicators | 2012 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
We analyzed ESA and the underlying concepts based on the variety of available publications and reviews, which revealed a number of different methods, uncertain reliability and robustness. In order to facilitate comparison, evaluation and synthesis of ecosystem service assessments we propose a blueprint for reporting studies in a structured way. By exemplifying this with worked examples, we argue that the use of such a blueprint will (i) assist in achieving improved communication and collaboration in transdisciplinary teams; (ii) reveal methodological aspects, important for the interpretation of results; (iii) support robustness and reliability of assessments; (iv) aid in structuring assessment studies and monitoring programs; (v) provide a base for comparing and synthesizing results of different studies (e.g. in meta-analysis), and thus (vi) provide a base for further implementation of ESA.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
Ralf Seppelt, Brian Fath, Benjamin Burkhard, Judy L. Fisher, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Sven Lautenbach, Petina Pert, Stefan Hotes, Joachim Spangenberg, Peter H. Verburg, Alexander P.E. Van Oudenhoven,
