Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4491641 Agricultural Systems 2011 11 Pages PDF
Abstract

The study develops a bio-economic crop management model that internalizes the environmental cost of nitrate pollution, accounts for stochastic weather, and includes an option for split fertilization. The integrated model is designed to indicate whether a producer can benefit from applying fertilizer several times during the growing season, in response to crop needs, rather than a single time, at sowing. The model is parameterized for the cultivation of spring malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Southern Finland. The costs of negative externalities from nitrogen leaching are internalized in the landowner’s decision problem through a pollution tax. The results indicate that without a pollution tax a single application of fertilizer gauged to meet the needs of the entire season is optimal. With a tax, the benefits of split application – applying varying amounts of fertilizer at selected stages of the growing season – increase significantly. In comparison to a single application of fertilizer at sowing, split fertilization improves yields, increases the total amount of fertilizer used, and reduces nitrogen leaching.

► Farm returns can be increased by adjusting N fertilizer applications to crop needs. ► Rational producer applies fertilizer once to meet the needs of the entire growing season. ► Split fertilization becomes optimal if a pollution tax is imposed on nutrient leaching.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Authors
, , , , ,